Premises Liability in Crofton
Trial-Ready Representation for Unsafe Property Injuries
Unsafe conditions at a home, store, rental property, or community common area can leave an injured person facing medical treatment, missed work, and questions about responsibility. Skipper Law, LLC represents people in Crofton, Maryland who have been injured by property hazards. We protect our clients’ rights through settlement negotiations and, when necessary, civil litigation.
Our practice serves injury and accident clients throughout Maryland. We examine how the incident occurred, who controlled the property, and whether the responsible party knew or should have known about the hazard. This review helps determine whether the facts support a premises liability claim.
Call (410) 919-2121 for a free, no-obligation consultation about an injury caused by an unsafe property.
Experience in Maryland Courts
We have substantial trial experience and are prepared to present cases before judges and juries when litigation becomes necessary. Our attorneys are admitted to Maryland District and Circuit Courts, the Appellate Court of Maryland, the Supreme Court of Maryland, the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Our personal injury success rate exceeds 99%, and we’ve secured millions of dollars in compensation for clients and families. Our results include a substantial recovery in Anonymous v. Building Owner for a slip-and-fall victim who suffered a traumatic brain injury. Past results don’t guarantee the outcome of a future claim, but they demonstrate our experience handling serious injuries.
Direct Attorney Guidance Through Resolution
Clients work directly with their attorney from the beginning of a case through its resolution rather than being handed off to paralegals. We respond promptly to questions so clients understand where their case stands and what may happen next.
We handle settlement negotiations and prepare to litigate when circumstances require it. Whether a claim resolves through negotiation or proceeds in the appropriate Maryland court depends on the evidence, disputed issues, and positions taken by the responsible parties and insurers.
Hazards That May Support a Premises Liability Claim
These claims focus on the hazard that caused the injury, who possessed or controlled the property, and whether that party had actual or constructive notice. Constructive notice means the danger existed long enough, or was apparent enough, that a responsible party should have discovered it.
Incidents that can raise premises liability issues include:
- Slip and fall injuries caused by hazards such as spills, damaged flooring, or untreated walking surfaces
- Dog bites involving an animal kept or controlled on the property
- Negligent security incidents connected to inadequate property safeguards
- Falling merchandise in retail locations
- Fires and unsafe pool conditions
Homes, retail businesses, rental properties, and HOA or condominium common areas can all present these questions. A premises case turns heavily on the condition of the property and the responsible party’s knowledge of it.
Who May Be Responsible for an Unsafe Property
A property owner isn’t automatically the only potentially responsible party. Depending on who controlled the area and had authority over maintenance or warnings, a claim may involve a property manager, business occupier, HOA, condominium association, or another party responsible for the hazard.
Maryland law also considers a visitor’s classification when defining a property owner’s duty of care. An invitee, such as a customer or patron, is generally owed reasonable care to keep the premises safe and a warning about hidden dangers. A licensee, such as a social guest, is generally owed reasonable care to keep the premises safe or a warning about known hidden dangers.
Establishing liability generally requires evidence of a dangerous condition, actual or constructive notice, a failure to correct the danger or provide an adequate warning, and an injury caused by that failure. Important evidence may include photographs, incident records, and surveillance footage, depending on the circumstances.
We also have substantial experience with community associations and property managers. We’ve represented homeowners in numerous disputes with their condominiums and HOAs, recovering millions of dollars from community associations, property managers, and their insurers. Although each premises liability claim is distinct, this work gives us familiarity with disputes involving HOA common areas and property control.
Maryland Deadlines & Contributory Negligence
Maryland follows contributory negligence, a rule that can bar recovery if an injured person’s own negligence contributed to the incident. Property owners and insurers may scrutinize where the person was looking, whether a warning was visible, and whether the danger could have been avoided. Because even partial fault can affect the entire claim, the available evidence requires careful review.
Maryland Courts and Judicial Proceedings Section 5-101 generally establishes a three-year statute of limitations for injury claims. A statute of limitations is the legal deadline for filing a lawsuit. The period generally begins on the injury date or when the injury was discovered, although the facts and applicable law determine the precise deadline.
Claims involving state or local government property can have shorter notice requirements than the general limitations period. Prompt legal review can identify the correct deadline and preserve evidence before footage is overwritten, conditions change, or witnesses’ memories fade.
Compensation for a Premises Liability Injury
Available damages may include medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, rehabilitation costs, and modifications related to a long-term disability. Punitive damages may be available when the evidence establishes actual malice, such as evil motive or intent to injure, by clear and convincing evidence. Maryland applies an annually adjusted cap to non-economic damages such as pain and suffering.
No fixed formula determines what a claim is worth. Its value depends on the injury, required treatment, financial losses, liability evidence, and available sources of recovery. Every case must be evaluated on its own evidence.
Discuss Your Unsafe Property Injury with an Attorney
We offer a free, no-obligation consultation to review what happened and discuss the legal options that may apply. These cases require no upfront attorney fees. Under our contingency-fee structure, attorney fees are paid only after we win.
Call (410) 919-2121 to speak with us about a premises liability claim in Crofton, Maryland.
-
Anonymous v. PM and Insurance Company
Policy limits paid to a man who lost mobility due to the negligence of another.
-
KB v. Defendant Driver
Policy limits tender for client with limited medical expenses, but suffered permanent injuries in her hands and wrists as a result of the accident.
-
Anonymous v. Building Owner
Substantial recovery for the victim of a slip-and-fall accident who suffered a traumatic brain injury.
-
Anonymous Family v. Defendant Driver
Near policy limits recovery was paid to the family of a young woman wrongfully killed by a negligent driver.
-
Anonymous v. Defendant Trucking Company
Recovery for victim struck by a large truck that failed to stop at a red light.
-
Anonymous v. Defendant Driver and Nationwide Insurance Co.
Six-figure recovery for victim of a multiple roll-over accident that claimed less than $20,000 in medical expenses.
-
Anonymous v. Defendant Homeowner
Sizable recovery for a minor attacked by a dog, causing injuries which required multiple stitches.
-
Anonymous Estate and Family v. Multiple Defendants
Recovery for family of wrongful death victim.
Hear From Our Happy Clients
At Skipper Law, LLC, your satisfaction is our priority! See for yourself what our clients have to say about working with us.
-
"Well-versed in the law and continuously worked to meet the needs of those seeking fair and just legal recourse."Matt and his entire team of legal experts were a tremendous help to me. They represented me in a case that involved a very scrupulous condo development, to which Matt and his team successfully settled my case.- Lou P.
-
"Thanks again Matt!!"My daughter was only 11 when she was hurt at a recreational venue. Matt successfully won her case, even with some very difficult legal circumstances!!- Kathy L.
-
"Take it from someone who works in the legal field — it is very difficult to find an attorney like Matt."I was rear-ended and slammed into the car in front of me. My car was totaled, and I was taken away in an ambulance. I immediately contacted Matt to consult him for legal advice, and he not only took on my case, but he also comforted me during a rough time.- Lisa A.
-
"Excellent personal service. Very easy to work with"Excellent personal service. Very easy to work with. We would definitely recommend and use in future.- AA Action Waterproofing
-
"He is not your typical lawyer, and has very high moral character, honesty, and integrity."I purchased a new SF home and we discovered that we had a water leak in the basement. Matt Skipper was able to help me win my claim against seller for not disclosing this as a "latent defect." Matt was very effective at gathering information and- Brian K.
-
"Skipper Law provides first class legal service."They performed excellent background research on my case, assembled all of the relevant facts and Mr. Skipper presented logical and convincing arguments in both District and Circuit court hearings.- John C.
-
"I recommend Matt for any of your legal issues."Matt is such a professional. I met Matt through a Bible Study at church and we talked about getting wills and other documents in order. When we met for the details he put my husband and myself at ease. The entire process was seamless.- Cindy W.
-
"Skipper Law provides first class legal service."They performed excellent background research on my case, assembled all of the relevant facts and Mr. Skipper presented logical and convincing arguments in both District and Circuit court hearings.- John C.